Information on Oriel^® Spectral Irradiance Data

The lamps are operated vertically and the measurement is made in the horizontal plane through the center of the radiating filament or arc. The lamps are rotated for maximum flux at the measurement site. This is particularly important for our planar filament quartz tungsten halogen lamps. At 0.5 m the flux density of all our lamps is uniform over at least a 25 x 25 mm² area. As you move out of the plane but still maintain the same 0.5 m distance and face the source, the recorded power should in principle fall according to Lambert’s Law for a planar source and remain constant for a point source. Measurements show something in between, with the arc lamps resembling point sources up to the electrode shadowing limit.
As you change the measuring distance from 0.5 m, the irradiance follows the inverse square law providing the distance, d, is larger than 20 to 30 times the radiating element size. The shortest distance we use in our measurements is 300 mm.

Working with Semi-Log Displays

The advantage of the semi-log display is the range our graphs cover, from very low levels to large peaks. Fig. 4 shows the linear display of the graph in Fig. 3. You get a much better sense of the height of the peaks, but the values at lower levels are lost.
The logarithmic compression can be deceptive when it comes to estimating the area under a portion of the curve, to determine the total irradiance from λ₁ to λ₂, for example. You cannot rely on a rapid visual comparison unless you remember that the area at the bottom must be discounted appropriately. The peaks are much more important than they seem! So, you should calculate the area using the data values you read from the curve.
The logarithmic scale complicates estimation of the amount of irradiance in any peak. The half maximum is no longer halfway between the peak top and the bottom of the graph. You can easily find the half maximum by measuring the distance from 1 to 2, or 10 to 20, etc., on the logarithmic axis scale. Moving down this distance from the peak locates the half maximum (Fig. 5). We discuss the spectral peaks in the discussion on see Calculating Output Power.

How Good is the Data?

We measured the irradiance data on all our lamps using both multichannel detectors with our MS257™ Spectrograph, and scanning monochromators. We used integrating spheres for most of the measurements. This effectively averages the polarization of the incoming radiation. Stress birefringence in the arc lamps and the filament structure of the lower power QTH lamps cause noticeable polarization of the output that may enhance or detract from your application.
We have a high degree of confidence in our data and cross check them with full radiant power meters and calibrated filters. The measurements are of lamps early in their life, operated in open air. Thermal conditions are different for lamps operated in lamp housings, and the spectral distribution changes slightly as the lamps age. Mercury lamps are particularly sensitive to thermal changes.
We see ±15% variation in output from lamp to lamp even within the same batch of lamps. We see substantially more variation in the UV output (<ca. 280 nm). Envelope materials, both for standard and ozone free versions, are continuously changing, and envelope thicknesses are not subject to tight tolerance.
In short, we believe that this set of data is the most comprehensive and reliable you will find for lamps of this type and are an excellent resource for first estimates. But don't base a tightly toleranced system design on the data without additional characterization of the lamp in its intended operating environment.

Finding the Right Spectral Irradiance Curve

Refer to Table 1 to find the spectral irradiance graph for your lamp. In the following, we show typical irradiance curves for selected lamps. You'll notice that we show the percentage of total irradiance in specific UV, VIS and NIR spectral ranges.

Table 1 UV-IR Radiation Sources